Research Methodology
See how we assess SwissVergleich and other trading platforms using public information, comparison principles, and risk awareness.
Research framework
Our framework covers provider identity, public documentation, products, pricing, order handling, security, accessibility, support, and risk communication. We ask the same core questions before considering surface-level convenience.
Sources and verification
We favour current legal documents, authoritative public registers, product disclosures, fee schedules, and clearly dated provider materials. Third-party commentary may suggest questions but does not replace primary evidence.
We distinguish what is publicly stated, what can be independently verified, and what remains unknown. We do not infer facts from branding, design, domain names, or unsupported reviews.
Comparison principles
Comparisons use equivalent products and scenarios wherever possible. Costs are considered across spread, commission, financing, conversion, and account actions. Features are evaluated for clarity and usefulness, not quantity alone.
Limits of the method
Public information can be incomplete or change after publication. Our work does not test every execution pathway and cannot determine personal suitability. It is education, not financial, legal, or tax advice.